S t a r h i l l  I n d e x

| index | Contact: |

Realspace:

Starhill Community Page
Kamungus + webcam
Starhill Academy of Anything
Corte Madera open space
Corte Madera trails
Tunitas Beach
Tunitas Ohlone ~1769
Kings Mountain Forum
Kings Mountain School
Kings Mountain Art Fair
Kings Mountain Artists
San Gregorio Store
Coastside Habitat Coalition
Pescadero Conservation
County Mosquito ofc.
Midpeninsula Open Space
GeoMAC  fire maps
Half Moon Bay Review
Mavericks
MavTV
KFJC
KPIG
stormsurf
Buck's Café,
Bridge School
Robert's Market
Kepler's Books
The Almanac
StarhillJawz
Starhill Solutions
Starhill Networks
Ventureblog
calmidwifery.org
Werner Glinka
Swan Mosaic
Poppy Art
Lobitos Creek Ranch
Kings Mtn.Llamas
South Skyline Association
craigslist: - peninsula

                              News and Views

Standard Geo-Coordinates?
August 3, 2003
/Mike Liebhold

Hypothesis: On a geospatial web, location coordinates, rather than a URL are the natural network address for data, documents, objects, programs, media.  Let's set aside the semantics of the attributes of place, for a moment,  and consider a simpler question:

Which coordinates will popularly prevail for ordinary users geocoding their data?

a)  latitude, longitude - Well known, and used commonly in aircraft and nautical navigation.

b.) UTM (zone,band,easting,northing) - Dificult to understand,  but more accurate, and already widely used with GPS, and by governments and businesses worldwide.

c.) both
d.) neither

I vote for c.) both. or d.) neither... Why? Coordinates are funky, and should be invisible to end users, invoked by a mouse-click on a graphical user interface. Latitude and longitude are inherently inaccurate geometrically, but  will continue to be popular since they're is already used commonly, especially  in aircraft and nautical navigation.

And, while the UTM (zone,band,easting,northing) system -  is certainly dificult to understand,   it's definitely more accurate,  it's measured in meters ( real distance), it's easily digitalized, and already widely used for many GPS applications, and on governments and business maps worldwide.

Here's a  background note  from excerpted from a gpsworld overview of UTM

" The UTM grid is of particular interest to anyone using a GPS receiver because most models offer UTM as a coordinate system option. UTM coordinates simply measure in meters east and north from two perpendicular reference baselines. All USGS 1:250,000 and 1:100,000 topographic maps carry a full UTM grid. ...On large-scale maps such as U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 1:24,000, 7.5 minute quadrangles, the simple numbers of the UTM grid make plotting precise locations easier than with the complex degrees, minutes, and seconds of latitude and longitude."

And this, an explanation of  "Why Use UTM coordinates" from Maptools, another GPS site:

" UTM Provides a constant distance relationship anywhere on the map. In angular coordinate systems like latitude and longitude, the distance covered by a degree of longitude differs as you move towards the poles and only equals the distance covered by a degree of latitude at the equator. Since land navigation is done in a very small part of the world at any one time using large scale maps. The UTM system allows the coordinate numbering system to be tied directly to a distance measuring system." 

comments? votes? mailto:mnl@starhill.us
                                                        


Mindspace:

Cybergeography.org
Cartographic Congress
DigitalEarth.org
Earth Observatory
Visible Earth
GPS World
Geourl
headmap.org/blog
Blogosphere
Internet Archive
TouchGraph Google
TouchGraph Amazon
Gizmodo
Oreillynet hub
BoingBoing
Glocal by Steve Cisler
Oren's Due Diligence
William Gibson
Kevin Kelly Recomendo
Smart Mobs
Schism Matrix
The Media Lab
memepool
Sterling's Mirroshades
Rudy Rucker
Scripting News
Technorati 100
futurefeedforward
theonion
Live365
MIT Radio List
Nature Journals Online
BBC News | SCI/TECH
Stewart Brand's links
hybrid vigor
All Species Home
Long Bets
Long Now
EDGE
Wired News
WorldlinkTV
World Press Review