Realspace
starhill community
37.39789, -122.34486
Mindspace:
cybergeography.org
cartographic
congress
digitalearth.org
earth
observatory
visible earth
gpster
geourl
headmap.org/blog
spacenamespace/blog
akuaku
webmapper.net
mapbureau.com
earthscope
library
virtual terrain
urban tapestries
Internet Archive
TouchGraph
Google
TouchGraph
Amazon
Gizmodo
Oreillynet hub
BoingBoing
Glocal by
Steve Cisler
Oren's Due
Diligence
Ventureblog
William
Gibson
Kevin
Kelly Recomendo
Smart Mobs
Schism Matrix
The Media Lab
memepool
Sterling's
Mirroshades
Rudy Rucker
Scripting News
Technorati
100
futurefeedforward
theonion
Live365
MIT Radio
List
Nature Journals
Online
BBC News
| SCI/TECH
Stewart
Brand's links
hybrid vigor
All Species Home
Long Bets
Long
Now
EDGE
Wired News
WorldlinkTV
World Press
Review
|
Microlocal
and Geospatial News and Views
Web Map
'Oscars'
August
21,
2003
/Mike Liebhold
Microsoft Mappoint .NET and Directions GIS News have announced their
picks for "Oscars
of Web Mapping".
Links to the 154 entries are here. These are
all very glossy, slick implementations. Some are pretty cool,
but most look to me like 'old school' GIS. Most of these, as far
as I
can see, were developed using standard tools from ESRI, AutoDesk,
Microsoft, Oracle. Edward Mac Gillavry points out that
today's Directions GIS news shows you
what
technologies were used: " MapServer, SVG, PERL, PHP, MySQL, etc feature
as well!
"
What's missing, for me, is a sense of the vastness of the www, and
of
interoperability between data sets. Why should I have to to fire up a
_separate_ map application every time for each discrete data
set? Why can't I
arbitrarily combine aligned data layers like web search terms in one
standard web client like a web browser, or ultimately in a visual
overlay
of reality?
There may be some solutions in the works. But a huge challenge is
ahead, masking the massive complexity of geospatial 'web services.
Here for example, is a note Sonny Parafina wrote to alert
me about 'Web Oscar' winner for '[Biggest Tease':
" AskTheSpider.com is a web
registry service (WRS) of OGC conformant web map and web feature
servers, this means it is a registry for both data and services.
The metadata is in ISO 19115 fand 19117 format and provides the
categories for searching. You can add the data to the map client
on AskTheSpider or click on the "detail" link to harvest the service
URL so you can use it in a mapping client that understands OGC WMS and
WFS calls.
Future plans
include a shopping cart type of script so you can collect all the
service URLs that you want and write it into a an OGC Context document,
which is an XML document that essentially stores all the the WMS
service URLS, the layers you want to view on each server, and the area
of interest for each layer. A mapping client can then just read
the Context file and, voila you have a map that you can modify or send
to a friend without having to host the data or be tied to a specific
server."
Whew! How will
grandpa ever understand that?
|
Previous:
overture
location search
mapping sensor
networks
wireless webGIS workshop
real spatial
spammers?
websigns
location links
web map
'oscars'
psycho-geos
in New York
wildland geomatics
agcountry geomatics
cool
spatial blogs 080703
geo metadata
pollution
euro cartos and
locatives
standard geo-coordinates?
google microlocal maps
hypertags, Ibuttons, geovectors
harvey lehtman's
hits
geospatial
libraries
geocode everything
digital
topo reviews
geographic
photoblogging
semantic geosearch
classified
Internet maps
web
map development
tom
kalil's picks
google
mapquest storefront
digitalearth.org geonews
cybergeography research
aspen
moviemap
geoscope
at planetwork
earth
observatory webby
cool geo aps from the CC
geospatial
religions
RFID tracking maps
wireless
and gps games
geocoded
realities
espresso,
no wireless
radio
frequency fog
RFID
trees on the web
kpig
on starhill
online
ecosystems
skyline
bears
internet
protocols via satellite
|